Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
2.
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 36(supl.2): e00008520, 2020.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1132881

ABSTRACT

Resumo: A vacinação é uma das maiores intervenções em saúde pública pela segurança e efetividade, porém nem sempre vacinar significa imunizar. Inúmeros aspectos relacionados tanto ao indivíduo que recebe a vacina, quanto à especificidade de cada imunobiológico administrado compõem o processo para a obtenção de uma adequada imunização, sendo essencial que sejam observados para não culminar em falhas vacinais. A análise dos estudos de imunogenicidade e efetividade para as vacinas sarampo, varicela e caxumba apontam para a necessidade da incorporação de duas doses aos calendários básicos de vacinação para o controle das referidas doenças. Estudos epidemiológicos que analisaram surtos dessas doenças identificaram casos em indivíduos que receberam duas doses da vacina, o que pode apontar provável falha secundária. Para a vacina febre amarela, a discussão atual reside no número de doses ideal para a proteção individual. A Organização Mundial da Saúde recomenda dose única para toda a vida. Apesar dos poucos relatos em literatura a respeito das falhas vacinais, os estudos de imunogenicidade demonstram perda de proteção ao longo dos anos, principalmente na faixa etária pediátrica. Num cenário atual de eliminação e controle de doenças, associado à diminuição da circulação de vírus selvagens, o papel da vigilância epidemiológica é fundamental para aprofundar o conhecimento a respeito dos múltiplos fatores envolvidos, que culminam com falhas vacinais e surgimento de surtos. A ocorrência de surtos de doenças imunopreveníveis impacta negativamente a credibilidade dos programas de imunização, acarretando baixas coberturas vacinais e interferindo no êxito da vacinação.


Resumen: La vacunación es una de las mayores intervenciones en salud pública, por su seguridad y efectividad, sin embargo, no siempre vacunar significa inmunizar. Innumerables aspectos relacionados tanto con el individuo que recibe la vacuna, como con la especificidad de cada inmunobiológico administrado, componen el proceso para conseguir una adecuada inmunización, siendo esencial que sean observados para no acabar con fallos en las vacunas. El análisis de los estudios de inmunogenicidad y efectividad para las vacunas sarampión, varicela y parotiditis, apuntan hacia la necesidad de la incorporación de dos dosis a los calendarios básicos de vacunación para el control de las mencionadas enfermedades. Estudios epidemiológicos que analizaron brotes de esas enfermedades identificaron casos en individuos que recibieron dos dosis de la vacuna, lo que puede apuntar un probable fallo secundario. Para la vacuna de fiebre amarilla la discusión actual reside en el número de dosis ideal para protección individual. La Organización Mundial de la Salud recomienda una dosis única para toda la vida. A pesar de los pocos relatos en la literatura, respecto a los fallos en las vacunas, los estudios de inmunogenicidad demuestran una pérdida de protección a lo largo de los años, principalmente en la franja de etaria pediátrica. En un escenario actual de eliminación y control de enfermedades, asociado a la disminución de la circulación de virus salvajes, el papel de la vigilancia epidemiológica es fundamental para profundizar el conocimiento respecto a los múltiples factores implicados, que culminan con fallos en las vacunas y surgimiento de brotes. La ocurrencia de brotes de enfermedades inmunoprevenibles impacta negativamente en la credibilidad de los programas de inmunización, acarreando bajas coberturas de vacunación e interfiriendo en el éxito de la vacunación.


Abstract: Vaccination is one of the greatest public health interventions, based on its safety and effectiveness, but vaccination does not always mean immunization. Numerous aspects related both to the individual that receives the vaccine and the specificity of each vaccine administered are part of the process of obtaining adequate immunization, and it is essential to observe the aspects in order to avoid vaccine failures. The analysis of immunogenicity and effectiveness studies for the measles, varicella, and mumps vaccines point to the need to incorporate two doses into the basic vaccination calendars in order to control these diseases. Epidemiological studies that analyzed outbreaks of these diseases identified cases in individuals that received two doses of the vaccine, which may indicate likely secondary failure. For the yellow fever vaccine, the current discussion lies in the ideal number of doses for individual protection. The World Health Organization recommends a single dose for life. Despite the few reports in the literature concerning vaccine failures, immunogenicity studies demonstrate waning protection over the years, mainly in the pediatric age bracket. In the current scenario of elimination and control of diseases, associated with the decrease in the circulation of the wild-type viruses, the role of epidemiological surveillance is crucial for expanding knowledge on the multiple factors involved, culminating in vaccine failures and the emergence of outbreaks. Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases negatively impact the credibility of immunization programs, leading to low vaccination coverage rates and interfering in vaccination's success.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Child , Rubella , Yellow Fever/prevention & control , Yellow Fever/epidemiology , Chickenpox , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/epidemiology , Brazil , Immunization Schedule , Vaccination , Vaccines, Combined , Chickenpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
3.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 36(1): 106-111, feb. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1003659

ABSTRACT

Resumen Comunicamos dos casos de meningitis aséptica asociadas a parotiditis viral en mujeres de edad mediana, una de ellas embarazada. Ambas se presentaron pocos días después del aumento de volumen parotídeo, con cefalea, fiebre y signos meníngeos, pleocitosis de predominio mononuclear en el LCR y resultados negativos para otras causas. La parotiditis fue confirmada por serología IgG e IgM positiva. Las pacientes tuvieron una evolución favorable con desaparición total de sus síntomas. Ambos casos ocurrieron durante un brote regional de parotiditis. La meningitis aséptica es una complicación frecuente de las parotiditis. Su diagnóstico puede lograrse por el aumento de volumen glandular precedente, la pleocitosis de predominio mononuclear en el LCR y una serología IgM e IgG positiva o detección genómica por RPC en muestra urinaria o salival. Esta complicación es más probable que sea observada durante brotes de parotiditis viral.


We report two cases of acute aseptic meningitis associated to mumps in middle-aged women, one pregnant. Both presented shortly after parotid gland enlargement. Neurological complications were suspected by headache, fever and meningeal signs and confirmed by CSF findings (mononuclear predominant pleocytosis) with negative results for alternative causes. Mumps were confirmed by positive IgM and IgG serology. Both patients were discharged with a favorable evolution and complete disappearance of symptoms. Cases were concurrent with a regional mumps outbreak. Conclusions: Aseptic meningitis is a rare mumps-associated neurological complication. Its diagnostic can be achieved by precedent parotid enlargement, mononuclear pleocytosis in the CSF and positive IgM and IgG serology or viral detection by PCR in urine or salivary samples. This complication would be more probably observed during mumps outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Meningitis, Aseptic/virology , Mumps/complications , Seasons , Time Factors , Chile/epidemiology , Incidence , Risk Factors , Age Distribution , Epidemics , Meningitis, Aseptic/pathology , Meningitis, Aseptic/epidemiology , Mumps/epidemiology
4.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 22(3): 317-329, July-Sept. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975585

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction A majority of otolaryngologists have not had direct experience with many vaccine-preventable diseases since the creation of national vaccination programs. Despite the elimination of endemic transmission of some of these diseases in the United States, outbreaks can occur anywhere and still pose a threat to public health around the world. Recent outbreaks and changing trends in exemption rates indicate that it is important for physicians to maintain a working knowledge of how these diseases present and of the recommended treatment guidelines. Objectives This review will evaluate the current state of vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and disease incidence in the United States and in the world. It will also examine the clinical presentation and treatment recommendations of these diseases. Data Synthesis United States estimated vaccination rates, vaccine exemption rates and vaccine-preventable disease incidences were obtained from data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World vaccination rates and disease incidences were obtained from the World Health Organization databases, which compile official figures reported by member states. A PubMed literature review provided information on the current state of vaccination exemptions and outbreaks in the United States. Conclusion Vaccination and vaccine exemption rates continue to put the United States and many areas of the world at risk for outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Clinical guidelines should be reviewed in the event of a local outbreak.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Otolaryngologists/education , Asia , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/epidemiology , United States , Americas , Vaccines , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Africa , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria/epidemiology , Europe , Disease Eradication/statistics & numerical data , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/epidemiology
5.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 50(4): 535-538, July-Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041418

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Neglected infectious diseases like mumps may be opportunistic in controlled areas with low vaccine coverage, particularly in developed and emerging countries. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of mumps-related data from 2001 to 2016 for São Paulo State, Brazil was conducted. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2015, there was an increase of 82% in reported mumps cases in São Paulo, with prevalence of n=49 and 297, respectively in young adults aged 15-29 years. CONCLUSIONS: A booster-shot campaign on MMR vaccination is recommended to prevent the spread of mumps in unvaccinated children and recipients of only the first dose.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Incidence , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Mumps/prevention & control
6.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 2009 Feb; 27(1): 80-6
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-558

ABSTRACT

Stored serum specimens, from four regions of Thailand, of healthy children attending well baby clinics and of healthy people with acute illnesses visiting outpatient clinics were randomly sampled and tested for IgG antibody to measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR). The immunity patterns of rubella and mumps fitted well with the history of rubella and MMR vaccination, seroprotective rates being over 85% among those aged over seven years. A high proportion of younger children acquired the infection before the age of vaccination. MMR vaccination should preferably be given to children at an earlier age. For measles, 73% seroprotective rates among children, aged 8-14 years, who should have received two doses of measles/MMR vaccine, were lower than expected. This finding was consistent with the age-group reported in outbreaks of measles in Thailand. The apparent ineffectiveness (in relation to measles) of MMR immunization of 1st grade students warrants further studies.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Age Factors , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Child , Female , Humans , Immunization Programs , Male , Measles/epidemiology , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Measles virus/immunology , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps virus/immunology , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Thailand/epidemiology , Time Factors , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage
7.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health ; : 408-415, 2009.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-181027

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to investigate the mumps transmission control status and inapparent infection rate among middle and high school students in Daegu City during a mumps outbreak. METHODS: Nine schools (two middle schools and seven high schools), which reported a number of mumps cases between 2007 and 2008 were selected for investigation. During March-May 2008, a standard questionnaire was distributed to gather information about case identification, instructed isolation measure, isolation status of mumps cases and related factors, and outdoor activities of non-isolated mumps case. Inapparent infection rate was estimated by serum mumps IgM and IgG antibodies status and self-reported mumps symptoms in three of the nine schools. RESULTS: Among 2,560 respondents, more than half of students answered that they did not receive instructions in mumps transmission control measures during the outbreak. Among the 327 mumps cases identified by the questionnaire, 131 cases (40.1%) were considered as isolated and the isolation rates were significantly different among schools, grades, and gender. Of the non-isolated cases, 88.3% continued attending school. Inapparent mumps infection rates were between 56.3% and 70.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Mumps transmission control was inadequate to control the mumps outbreak. Although high inapparent infection rate would mitigate the transmission control effect of case isolation, this measure is fundamental for infection control. The reasons of this inadequate status need to be explored to develop an effective intervention strategy.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Mumps/epidemiology , Patient Isolation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Students
10.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 20(5): 299-306, nov. 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-444602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the seroprevalence for measles, mumps, and rubella in school-age children (6-12 years old) before and after the administration of three triple combined viral vaccines. METHODS: In two municipal schools of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 692 blood samples were collected before vaccination and 636 samples 21 to 30 days after vaccination during 1996. IgG antibody seropositivity was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (measles and mumps with Enzygnost [Behring, Marburg, Germany]; rubella with Rubenostika [Organon Teknica, Boxtel, the Netherlands]). The vaccines compared were: A: E-Zagreb, L-Zagreb, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Tresivac); B: Moraten, J-Lynn, and Wistar RA 27/3 (M-M-R II); and C: Schwarz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Trimovax). RESULTS: Before vaccination, 79.2 percent [95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 76.0 percent-82.2 percent] of the samples were positive for measles, 69.4 percent (95 percent CI = 65.8 percent-72.8 percent) for mumps, and 55.4 percent (95 percent CI = 51.6 percent-59.2 percent) for rubella. After vaccination with the A, B, and C vaccines, seropositivity was 100.0 percent, 99.5 percent, and 100.0 percent, respectively for measles; 99.5 percent, 94.5 percent, and 92.0 percent for mumps; and 92.6 percent, 91.3 percent, and 88.6 percent for rubella. CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth (20.8 percent) of the schoolchildren who could have been vaccinated against measles at age 9 months had levels of antibodies insufficient for protection. In the sample of schoolchildren without previous vaccination against mumps and rubella, high proportions of susceptible levels were found. All vaccines were immunogenic, but vaccine A yielded a seroconversion rate of 99.5 percent for the mumps component, which was significantly higher than the other two vaccines (P < 0.01).


OBJETIVO: Se evaluó la seroprevalencia para sarampión, paperas y rubéola en niños en edad escolar (6-12 años) antes y después de la administración de tres vacunas triples antivirales combinadas. MÉTODOS: Se colectaron 692 muestras de sangre antes de la vacunación y 636 muestras entre 21 y 30 días después de la vacunación a niños de dos escuelas municipales de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, durante 1996. Se investigó la seropositividad de anticuerpos de la clase IgG mediante un ensayo de inmunoadsorción enzimática tipo ELISA (sarampión y paperas con Enzygnost [Behring, Marburgo, Alemania] y rubéola con Rubenostika [Organon Teknica, Boxtel, Países Bajos]). Las vacunas comparadas fueron: a) E-Zagreb, L-Zagreb y Wistar RA 27/3 (Tresivac); b) Moraten, J-Lynn y Wistar RA 27/3 (M-M-R II); y c) Schwarz, Urabe AM-9 y Wistar RA 27/3 (Trimovax). RESULTADOS: Antes de la vacunación, 79,2 por ciento (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95 por ciento: 76,0 a 82,2) de las muestras fueron positivas para sarampión, 69,4 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 65,8 a 72,8) para paperas y 55,4 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 51,6 a 59,2) para rubéola. Después de la vacunación con las vacunas A, B y C, la seropositividad fue de 100 por ciento, 99,5 por ciento y 100 por ciento, respectivamente para sarampión; de 99,5 por ciento, 94,5 por ciento y 92,0 por ciento para paperas; y de 92,6 por ciento, 92,3 por ciento y 88,6 por ciento para rubéola. CONCLUSIONES: Alrededor de un quinto (20,8 por ciento) de los escolares que pudieron haber sido vacunados contra el sarampión a los 9 meses de edad tenían niveles de anticuerpos insuficientes para protegerlos. En la muestra de escolares sin vacunación previa contra paperas y rubéola se encontró una alta proporción de niños susceptibles. Todas las vacunas fueron inmunogénicas, pero la vacuna A produjo una tasa de seroconversión de 99,5 por ciento para el componente de paperas, significativamente mayor que la de las otras dos vacunas (P < 0,01).


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Brazil , Double-Blind Method , Measles/blood , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/blood , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/blood , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Time Factors
11.
Rev. para. med ; 19(1): 19-23, jan.-mar. 2005. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-436529

ABSTRACT

Introdução: A caxumba é uma infecção viral aguda que ocorre principalmente em crianças e adolescentes na idade escolar. Durante a infecção os anticorpos IgG, geralmente são detectados cerca de duas a três semanas após o inicio dos sintomas, indicando imunidade adquirida. A presença de anticorpos IgM iniciam com eleva- dos títulos até as duas primeiras semanas, com posterior redução desses níveis, possibilitando o diagnóstico de infecção aguda ou recente. Objetivo: Determinar a freqüência de anticorpos das classes G (IgG) eM (IgM) para o vírus da caxumba em indivíduos assintomáticos residentes em dois bairros da área urbana de Belém, Pará, Brasil. Método: Foram coletadas 411 amostras de soro de indivíduos assintomáticos provenientes de dois bairros de Belém, Pará (Terra Firme e Guamá) no período de setembro a novembro de 1994. Todos os espécimes colhidos foram examinados pelo método imunoenzimático (ELISA) utilizado na detecção de anticorpos IgG e IgM específicos para o vírus da caxumba. Resultados: Em 63,5 por cento (261/411) das amostras de soro testadas foram detectados anticorpos da classe IgG e, em 12,9por cento (53/411), anticorpos da classe IgM para o vírus da caxumba. o sexo masculino foi mais acometido que o feminino com 81,8por cento (153/187) e 48,2por cento (108/224), respectivamente, com diferença estatística significativa de P=0,00l. Nossos resultados demonstraram que 52,4por cento (119/227) dos indivíduos investigados com idades abaixo de 15 anos foram susceptíveis à infecção pelo vírus em questão. Conclusão: Esses resultados podem ser utilizados para que sejam intensificadas medidas profiláticas capazes de reduzir o aparecimento dessa virose na população de Belém, Pará, Brasil


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Mumps virus/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Serologic Tests
12.
Indian Pediatr ; 2004 Nov; 41(11): 1181-2
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-12412
14.
In. Farhat, Calil Kairalla; Carvalho, Eduardo da Silva; Weckx, Lily Yin; Carvalho, Luiza Helena Falleiros R; Succi, Regina Célia de Menezes. Imunizaçöes: fundamentos e prática. Säo Paulo, Atheneu, 2000. p.403-12.
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-281289
15.
Rev. Soc. Boliv. Pediatr ; 33(1): 20-3, 1994. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-238529

ABSTRACT

La patologia infeciosa bacteriana de la glándula parótida se observa en dos circustancias, una afectando al recién nacido y lactante menor, con caracterisiticas d proceso agudo localizado a la parótida o formando parte de un cuadro de sepsis; otra es la que se observa en la parotiditis recurrente, cuya etiopatogenia todavia se desconoce, siendo el preoceso supurativo, aparentemente, un denómeno secundario. El pronóstico ha mejorado al heberse evitado las complicaciones con el uso de antibioticos, permitiendo la remisión espontánea en la edad puberal.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Parotid Gland/pathology , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/epidemiology , Parotitis/diagnosis , Parotitis/epidemiology , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/epidemiology
16.
Rev. cuba. enferm ; 6(1): 118-27, ene.-abr. 1990. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF | ID: lil-91549

ABSTRACT

Se estudió la totalidad de los casos afectados por parotiditis en los meses de enero a septiembre de 1986 (1 767 casos) y 1987 (124 casos), así como los enfermos de rubeola notificados en el mismo período de 1986 (8584 casos) y 1987 (5 casos) en la provincia de inar del Río. Se destacó el alza en la tasa de incidencia con base anual, por 100 000 habitantes que han tenido ambas entidades durante 1986 en los diferentes municipios. Se comenta la tendencia francamente descendente que han tenido las 2 enfermedades en 1987 después de la vacunación triple viral (93%) para la parotiditis y el 99,15% para la rubeola. Se comprobó que las entidades en estudio afectaron más a los niños en la edad escolar (5-14 años). Se demostró que ambas enfermedades no son frecuentes por debajo de un año de edad (76,4 y 120,1 casos por 100 000 habitantes respectivamente). Se comprobó el tanto por ciento de efectividad de la vacuna, el 97,4% para la parotiditis y eliento por ciento para la rubeola


Subject(s)
Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella/epidemiology
18.
19.
Monography in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1276160

ABSTRACT

Mumps is caused by a virus of the paramyxovirus family (also measles and prainfluenza). the virus is spread by airborne droplets through the respiratory tract; mouth; and possibly conjunctivae and urine; and is present in saliva; CSF; blood and urine. Clinical presentation:- . Incubation period is 14-24 days. Onset is with painful swelling of paroid glands; fever; general malaise; and occuasionally headache. Parotid swelling may be unilateral at first; followed a couple of days later by swelling of the opposite paratoid gland; with pain on opening the dry mouth. Mild meningoencephalitis is common; there may be nausea and vomiting; and abdominal pain. Orchitis presents with fever and tender oedematous swelling of the testis. In 10-20of cases the second testicle may be affected. However; infertility is rare. Differential diagnosis of parotitis includes cervical adenitis; pyogenic parotitis; recurrent parotitis; tumours of the parotid and tooth infections. Mumps orchitis can mimic hernias; tumours; haematomas; epididymo-orchitis and testicular torsion. Complications:- Complications include oophoritis; mastitits; pancreatitis; nephritis; myocarditis; thyroiditis; labyrinthine disturbance; painful swelling of the lacrimal glands; optic neuritis; uveeokeratitis; rapid loss of vision; arthritis; jaundice; pneumonia and thrombocytopenia. Transient or permanent unilateral nerve deafness has been reported. Infection during pregnancy very rarely causes disease of the fetus; for example aqueductal stenosis and hydrocephalus. Management: symptomatic treatment includes analgesics; fluids and scrotal support for orchitis. Value of corticosteroids for orchitis is not established. Prevention:- Measles; mumps; rubella (MMR) immunisation is routine in rich countries and has reduced mumps by over 90


Subject(s)
Mumps/complications , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL